- Each reader needs to form his or her own opinion of the novel to decide
- One can, therefore, only decide whether or not to read it after reading it himself/herself
- The wilderness is personified, though in a gender neutral way (it)
- The woman by the river is said to be Kurtz's "African mistress"
- Heart of Darkness can be seen as based on Biblical parables and stories
- Is Heart of Darkness an apocalyptic story?
- 'Apocalypse' means lifting the veil, in this sense, Heart of Darkness is apocalyptic
- Is it also apocalyptic in the sense of the imminent destruction of a society?
- Conrad had previously referred to the "piety of writing," is this evidence for Heart of Darkness as a religiously motivated work?
- Heart of Darkness is marked by "authoritarian, fascist concepts of universal prosperity" being brought by a particular nation or culture
- In the end, it is up to each person to decide whether or not to read Heart of Darkness, though this writer feels one certainly should
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Ought We Read Heart of Darkness?
So, ought we read Heart of Darkness or not?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment